Intel released its first Celeron based on the Pentium 4 "Willamette" (Socket 478) pin design in May 2002, but performance is hurt by the chip's meagre 128K of on-chip cache memory. In fact, PCWorld.com finds that a 1.3GHz Celeron (based on the older Pentium 3 "Tualatin" architecture, with a 256K cache) delivers better performance in some tests. So, again, we have a case of marketing over engineering. In essence, Intel is advertising a higher clock speed, yet delivering a lower performing chip -- at least in some applications.
With that said, the performance of the new P4 Celeron isn't that much lower than the P4. A comparably clocked 1.7 GHz P4 system is only about 10 percent faster than a 1.7GHz Celeron system costing US$179 less. So, for price-conscious consumers (many of whom, we think, will find that either processor is plenty fast enough), the product may find a niche -- The new Celeron beats AMD's similarly priced 1.3 GHz Duron in almost every test. Just don't be fooled by the clock speed. In some applications, however, a Tualatin-based Celeron delivers better performance, despite its lower clock speed.
Aside from the obvious differences in required motherboards, the main difference in the new "Willamette" Celeron is its support of the newest SSE2 instruction set, which helps the Pentium 4 excel in audio and video encoding and related tasks.
At this writing, the 1.7GHz Celeron sells for about C$150 and works in Socket 478 mainboards capable of supporting a 400 MHz bus, including Intel's just-announced 845GL chip set.
Price cuts, new models announced; more price cuts coming
Pentium 4 price cuts, new models
Intel really, really wants you to make your next processor...
Post new comment